another face turn for big show?
guess not, creative rko though.
you know who should crash this party. forget cena, sting, taker, angle, kane.... new day needs to come out with a trombone, a bass drum and a kazoo. DO IT!
meh, it wasnt new day, but i guess it was pretty good.
I have never been one to partake in this, except when me favorite college school starts up the chant but...
YES! YES! YES!
i guess triple h just confirmed rollins vs sting at noc...
I am so torn about this.
So Dudleys are back? That's pretty cool.
League Team Record Wild Card Division Pennants Titles MSL Kansas City Royals (NYY/TB) 3611-3517 1 14 8 7 TBL Cleveland Indians 1084-698 2 5 2 1 HSL Chicago Cubs 2071-1764 1 9 4 1
Stings wins only to have that tool Sheamus cash in?
That would piss so many people off. Enough people were mad that Sting lost at Mania when, at the time, no one was sure if he would be one and done or not. So if he does manage to get the title, he has to drop it back to Rollins or someone... good? Maybe something utilizing Sting's connection to Flair to go back and forth with the Authority/Rollins
So far Sting has had great pops in WWE, but don't disrespect him again. His Mania match wasn't even about him, and although DX/nWo was something many dreamed about, it was a disservice to Sting.
I'm not saying I want that to happen, but it wouldn't shock me. I agree; his Wrestlmania match was a joke. Why bring him in just to lose to someone that didn't even gain anything from it (assuming you had to have him lose in the first place)?
Not only that, Sting's first Mania match became essentially a showcase for nWo/DX, as opposed to really being about Sting. If it was a one time deal, he definitely should have won. Everything we are getting now is just like a bonus, and hopefully redemption with a good run and a final match at Mania, culminating in a WIN.
rollins shouldnt lose to anyone, that doesnt lead to a long term feud [i mean years worth of feuding... on the rock/hhh level]. rollins should beat sting clean. when rollins loses the belt... daniel bryan, dean ambrose or roman reigns are the only names at the moment, that should be the guy to get the win. i love lesnar and taker, they dont need the strap... same thing for sting. and cesaro and owens [sadly] arent there.
and sheamus should lose when he cashes in, just to give it the illusion that its possible. i believe sandow, when vince/creative cooled badly on him, and cena, are the only two guys to lose/not win the belt on their cash in. theres no purpose to sheamus winning the belt, and theres nowhere for him to go... use him as the vehicle to give the mitb case the "its possible to beat it" aura.
I know they'd NEVER go there but after Reigns/Ambrose feud starts...
The authority comes to try and interfere with Sting. Out goes the lights and the Wyatts appear. Just to change it up. Start Wyatt vs Rollins vs HHH which both guys could really use the exposure of being involved with Triple H. Let's Sting get some momentum after that stupid WrestleMania decision.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HollywoodLeo: You and Kingdom always annoy me
"Oh, don't mind me, I'm rebuilding now" then you win at least 80 games
RIP S3SL Minnesota Twins.
RIP HSL Anaheim Angels
Rebuilding the Dodger Blues
Renewed Start back in the land of 10,000 lakes