Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: 2016 Draft Discussion

  1. #1
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    2016 Draft Discussion

    Washington is on the clock...

    any thoughts on the class?

  2. #2
    14,558 Unread Posts browntown653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,666
    MLB ERA
    2.44

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Class definitely looks above-average to me...I'll be surprised if Abernathy doesn't go first
    I did a lot of good things as a sim league GM.

    Ah, give me something clever to say here.

  3. #3
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    it looks like the starting pitching is a little thin, but it's not that bad, and other than that it looks quite good
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  4. #4
    Broadcaster DMBZeppelin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Griffith, IN
    Posts
    1,582
    AAA ERA
    5.04

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    A nice class, and hopefully it moves as well as drafts in the past. From June 4th to 15th I'll be on a cruise. So limited internet access. I'm hoping to have at least made my 1st round pick before I leave.
    Former GM of...
    S3SL Padres 2017-2030
    SBSL Isotopes 2007-2009
    TSSL Cubs 2006-2018
    TPSL Cubs 2007-2018

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    So, brownie, you know me pretty well....

  6. #6
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Starting pitching shouldn't overloaded...those specs should go to the worst teams. I did add to every position so believe me when I say it's loads better than what the computer came up with. And it's certainly not a thin league overall. People will be getting better than a 4.0 pick in the 2nd and better than a 3.0 in the 3rd. Everyone should get 4 - 5 solid picks to add to their system.

    I find it funny that there is a CPU generated guy with the nickname "Cobra" given the theme.

  7. #7
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    I agree. It's just that there are teams like mine that need SP so badly, but we still turn in a .500 record or thereabouts every year, so I don't get one of those top picks. I'm not going to lose on purpose, that's ridiculous, but with such a low fan interest I can't get the money to get stop-gap free agents to get my team over the top. So I have to look the specs. And I was hoping to get a dominant SP spec for the next few years with Austin losing talent randomly . So basically my team's stuck in a never-ending spiral of mediocrity
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  8. #8
    14,558 Unread Posts browntown653's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    11,666
    MLB ERA
    2.44

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by giantsfan5689 View Post
    I agree. It's just that there are teams like mine that need SP so badly, but we still turn in a .500 record or thereabouts every year, so I don't get one of those top picks. I'm not going to lose on purpose, that's ridiculous, but with such a low fan interest I can't get the money to get stop-gap free agents to get my team over the top. So I have to look the specs. And I was hoping to get a dominant SP spec for the next few years with Austin losing talent randomly . So basically my team's stuck in a never-ending spiral of mediocrity
    Poor baby. Want a cookie?

    Remind me why you can't lose on purpose also...it's called "rebuilding"
    I did a lot of good things as a sim league GM.

    Ah, give me something clever to say here.

  9. #9
    Past his age-27 peak Saber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your mom
    Posts
    4,488
    MLB ERA
    1.08

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Rebuilding suggests that there was something there in the first place.

    Tanking is for losers.

  10. #10
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    because losing on purpose is for wusses. that's not realistic, nor is it in the spirit of the game. i will not do that.
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  11. #11
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    so you wanted a draft deep enough for 5.0 SP specs to be taken at the 17th pick? That would be a ridiculous draft...unless SP specs were the only thing good in it. There would have to be 15 stud SP specs in order for you to get one then...that's insane. You could always trade for SP...the reason you have little money is because you lost over $7 mil last year.

  12. #12
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Well, Kyle, it's not so much losing on purpose, but try trading away your high priced older talent. That way you get prospects back and set yourself up for the future.

  13. #13
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    is that my fault? I have a low payroll, and I still lost money. That's not my fault. The only big contract I've signed so far is Chris Shelton which, granted it was quite a bit too much, was still not enough to put me in so deep a financial hole.

    I realize you can't make such a deep draft. But what do you expect me to do?
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  14. #14
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by ljshorty89 View Post
    Well, Kyle, it's not so much losing on purpose, but try trading away your high priced older talent. That way you get prospects back and set yourself up for the future.
    I realize this, and I wasn't planning on rebuilding because I thought I had the abiility to at least make it to the playoffs and maybe increase my fan interest for some more money. And I'm gonna try it for one more season. If it doesn't work out, I'm fire-saleing. We'll see what happens.
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  15. #15
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: 2016 Draft Discussion

    Draft the best you can with what's there and trade.

    Making a ridiculously deep draft would be unfair to GMs like me who's trying to dig the shitty Padres and their albatross contracts out of the hole.

    I actually have free agency money this year!
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •