2008 NFL Predictions

[cjkalt]

Packers are winning the NFC North, just thought I'd establish that right now

The only way the Packers win the division is with brett farve at QB

[browntown653]

Yeah, don't worry about the great running game, great receiving corps, solid tight ends, great offensive line, great defensive line, good linebackers, and good secondary. Green Bay's got no chance

[cjkalt]

Yeah, don't worry about the great running game, great receiving corps, solid tight ends, great offensive line, great defensive line, good linebackers, and good secondary. Green Bay's got no chance

Ryan Grant is not great, this is coming from an ND fan so I know what he is, Great recieving core... u got jennings and...umm, TE's are solid, your O-Line is good, great is an overstatement, linebackers are very good, but the secondary is questionable...

And by the way, if you want to look at history at a team with all those things and still were bad look no farther then the Chicago Bears...

[browntown653]

Ryan Grant is not great, this is coming from an ND fan so I know what he is

Oh excuse me, Grant went to the same college as you so you know how good he is. You must have missed the 956 yards in 10 starts with 8 TDs and 5.1 YPC last year...

Great recieving core... u got jennings and...umm

By "umm," you mean Donald Driver (82 catches for 1048 yards), James Jones (47 catches as a rookie and some of the best hands in the league), Ruvell Martin (4 TDs as the #5 receiver), and Jordy Nelson (one of the finalists for the Biletnikoff Award last year), along with Jennings who is one of the best TD threats in the league?...that's a pretty good "umm"

your O-Line is good, great is an overstatement

Is it? They allowed 19 sacks all of last year, third in the league.

but the secondary is questionable...

6th in the league in interceptions, two Pro Bowl corners in Woodson and Harris with a hard-hitting up and coming star in Bigby and a solid player in Collins. I'd say it's better than questionable.

And by the way, if you want to look at history at a team with all those things and still were bad look no farther then the Chicago Bears...

We have an offense.

[Porter]

Something out of the ordinary happens every year (The Browns last year), I like KC's young core on the defensive end, and a healthy Larry Johnson should open up the deep game for Bowe

In an easier division they got the chance to rack up the wins, I don't see your predictions here, i'd love to see those, although they'll prolly be a espn.com paste.

Ill give you two words that will dispel that whole theory: Brodie Croyle.

[Porter]

AFC East:
Pats
Bills
Jets
Dolphins

AFC North
Steelers
Browns (WC)
Ravens
Bengals

AFC South
Jaguars
Colts (WC)
Titans
Texans

AFC West
Chargers
Broncos
Raiders
Chiefs

NFC East
Cowboys
Giants (WC)
Eagles (I still think McNabb will get a hangnail and be out for the season)
Redskins

NFC North
Packers
Vikings (WC)
Bears
Lions

NFC South
Saints
Panthers
Buccaneers
Falcons

NFC West
Seachickens
Rams
Cardinals
Niners (I'll go hide under a rock, but they should score 10 or more at least this season)

[brewcrewrock]

Also you have to consider where Farve might end up and if he ends up in Minnesota they will be an elite team, also tavaris jackson isn't that bad, with their additions on the defensive side of`the ball they will be an elite NFC team

hahaha! do you really think the packers will trade him to a team in the NFCA north! they already said they wont

[brewcrewrock]

Hahahahaha....wow. I think Browntown said it best when he said you need to stop watching sports.

yeah! haha man am i dumb if i can think that ryan grant, who nearly averaged 100 yards a game (when he playd) and got 8 tds, if think that he can even be compared to adrian peterson! notice how alott of people say that ryan grant is good! and i didnt say he was better then peterson, i was makign it out that the packers also have a decent-good running game! and our WR core is one of the bets in the league, and if you think it was all favre, we OWNED! the stat of yards after catch last year so it wasnt ALL favre. Secondary solid, nick barnet, nick collins, atari bigby, aaron kampman, KGB, Charles Woodson, Nick Collins, All Harris! Also do you think that favte won all 13 games last year! NEWSFLASH! but we still do have a qaurterback! watch aaron rogers highlights from against the cowboys, and Favre may even be back to the pack! And what do the LIONS have that the packers don't! haha! ur so dumb

[cjkalt]

Before anyone picks the steelers to win the division...go look at their schedule and gimme their 10 wins... its not happening lol

As for the Pack, your team is as good as Chicago last year... you look like a replica...good everywhere but QB... look what happened to them

[BuckFoston]

yeah! haha man am i dumb if i can think that ryan grant, who nearly averaged 100 yards a game (when he playd) and got 8 tds, if think that he can even be compared to adrian peterson! notice how alott of people say that ryan grant is good! and i didnt say he was better then peterson, i was makign it out that the packers also have a decent-good running game! and our WR core is one of the bets in the league, and if you think it was all favre, we OWNED! the stat of yards after catch last year so it wasnt ALL favre. Secondary solid, nick barnet, nick collins, atari bigby, aaron kampman, KGB, Charles Woodson, Nick Collins, All Harris! Also do you think that favte won all 13 games last year! NEWSFLASH! but we still do have a qaurterback! watch aaron rogers highlights from against the cowboys, and Favre may even be back to the pack! And what do the LIONS have that the packers don't! haha! ur so dumb

Haha I was not making a comment about your Packers I was talking about Adrian Peterson and Ryan Grant. Nowhere did I ever say anything about your secondary or Favre. I'm dumb though huh? Well..at least I can spell and at least I know proper English. Its okay though bud. Your Packers are good..I'm not saying they aren't. Grant's a good back, trust me, I know. He was on my fantasy team last year but I'm just saying..The Vikings have Adrian Peterson and the Packers don't. I mean, that was the question you asked, was it not?

[HollywoodLeo]

The Packers definitely have a chance at the division, with or without Favre.

I just think Adrian Peterson and the Vikings D is enough to give them the edge.

[Porter]

Haha I was not making a comment about your Packers I was talking about Adrian Peterson and Ryan Grant. Nowhere did I ever say anything about your secondary or Favre. I'm dumb though huh? Well..at least I can spell and at least I know proper English. Its okay though bud. Your Packers are good..I'm not saying they aren't. Grant's a good back, trust me, I know. He was on my fantasy team last year but I'm just saying..The Vikings have Adrian Peterson and the Packers don't. I mean, that was the question you asked, was it not?

Have the Vikings improved that medicore pass defense yet. Or realized that Travis Jackson is not the answer?

[Porter]

Before anyone picks the steelers to win the division...go look at their schedule and gimme their 10 wins... its not happening lol

As for the Pack, your team is as good as Chicago last year... you look like a replica...good everywhere but QB... look what happened to them

Houston
At Cleveland
At Philly
Baltimore
At Cincy
At Washington
Cincy
At Bal
Dallas
Cleveland

[HollywoodLeo]

Houston
At Cleveland
At Philly
Baltimore
At Cincy
At Washington
Cincy
At Bal
Dallas
Cleveland

They're not sweeping Cincy or Cleveland, they won't beat Dallas.

That takes it down to 7, not too pretty.

[cjkalt]

I don't think they sweep an improved ravens either which gets me to 6 wins