Baltimore Orioles
Boston Red Sox
New York Yankees
Tampa Bay Rays
Toronto Blue Jays
Chicago White Sox
Cleveland Indians
Detroit Tigers
Kansas City Royals
Minnesota Twins
Houston Astros
LA Angels
Oakland Athleticss
Seattle Mariners
Texas Rangers
Atlanta Braves
Miami Marlins
New York Mets
Philadelphia Phillies
Washington Nationals
Chicago Cubs
Cincinnati Reds
Milwaukee Brewers
Pittsburgh Pirates
St. Louis Cardinals
Arizona Diamondbacks
Colorado Rockies
Los Angeles Dodgers
San Diego Padres
San Francisco GiantsI disagree, Amare in 04-05(Nash's first MVP season) avg 26 ppg and 9 rpg. The year before avg 20 and 9.Originally Posted by ljshorty89
I disagree, Amare in 04-05(Nash's first MVP season) avg 26 ppg and 9 rpg. The year before avg 20 and 9.
I disagree, I dont think Nash deserved any of those MVPs, Shaq deserved it on 04-05, in 05-06 Kobe deserved it more than Nash IMO.
And to be honest with you guys, the NBA MVP has become a joke IMO, there is no set criteria on who/what is an MVP.
Nash deserved them. The suns don't matter if they stuck with Stephon Marbury. And if you argue Barbosa could run them, you must watch some other NBA league.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
Yes there is, it's the concept of THE MOST VALUABLE PLAYER. That's all you need to know. You pick the player most valuable to their team. You don't have to have any set minimums or anything. It's simply the most valuable player
I will succumb to the idea that it is arguable whether or not Nash deserved his first. But in 05-06, Nash did not have Stoudamire. He was the leader of a team that was only him and Marion. What you have to realize is that the MVP is not about scoring. The ball has to get to Marion and Stoudamire, and Barbosa or Marbury would not do that as consistently.
It's also injecting the belief the team can beat anyone.
Kobe can do that, but he wasn't really doing that before this season.
Marshall: MILSWANCAs?
Ted: Wait, I can get this. Mothers I'd like to sleep with and never call again.
Barney: Circle gets the square!
The 2074 MSL NL Gold Glove Recipient at Third Base.
Then tell me why Stockton didn't get any MVPs in his great career? Both are similar players, 20 ppg, 10 apg, except Stockton played defense, NBA's alltime steals and assist leader.
No there isn't you got players winning MVP award based on the best record, not based on numbers, if that logic is true, Arod and Jimmy Rollins dont deserve to win the MVP awards because there teams didn't have the best record in there leagues.
Micheal Jordan and Allen Iverson lead the league in scoring while winning the MVP award.
Kobe should have won it in 05-06 but he didn't because allot of voters hold his Colorado incident against him.
And Stockton only had one superstar in Malone his whole career, and yet he never even got consideration for one.
two words: Michael Jordan.
And all Nash has been doing is beating less superior teams in the regular season and losing to superior teams in the postseason.
And everyone is saying that Kobe is the closest to Jordan we got right now.
MVP doesn't take into account the postseason, technically. Also, you made my point. MJ won, now Kobe will.
I wasn't arguing that Kobe deserves to win the MVP this year, I was only arguing why Nash didn't deserve his MVPs and how the MVP system is flawed in the NBA.
I had to go with Chris Paul.
well, the MVP system is flawed in every league, if you ask me. But I think that Nash deserved one of his two.
Register To Reply
