Where all my bitches at?

[Mach]

But the entire topic of this discussion is why those very people left and what could have been done to prevent them from leaving.

Yes, but we don't know if they would have left had the offenders been punted. It's very possible too conservative of an approach was taken. If they were consulted on it, like in my idea, it would have been known.

[Mach]

Punted over disagreements...that's kind of what you're suggesting we should have done with LTR.

Not entirely. I don't recall the story too well, but it stemmed from one entrenched person disagreeing with another on how a 3rd string RB would pan out, and then a ban for a disagreement. LTR seemed to have antagonized most everyone over a long period of time. The 1st person fits the board culture. The 2nd seemed to not.

[Mach]

"the Juan Pierre of posters" that's fucking brilliant.

[HollywoodLeo]

Yes, but we don't know if they would have left had the offenders been punted. It's very possible too conservative of an approach was taken. If they were consulted on it, like in my idea, it would have been known.

If they would have left with or without them being gone the entire latter portion of our discussion is moot.

[Mach]

If they would have left with or without them being gone the entire latter portion of our discussion is moot.

In terms of retention, yes. This portion of our discussion though is based around theory and method.

[Kingdom]

"the Juan Pierre of posters" that's fucking brilliant.

not only do I diagnose everyone, I also compare people to athletes...just cause

[Tobywan]

"Juan Pierre of posters"


I almost spewed my ice tea all over my lap top when I saw that.

There is definitely no place for slurs of any kind especially if directed at someone for the sole purpose of inflaming and baiting them or because they have no better counter point then "your mother".

I miss Mission, too.

BTW, can this be called a "board meeting"...har har.

Okay, it's dinner time.....Italian tonight.

[Kingdom]

To LTR's credit, he never crossed the line. I'd prolly lift his ban if he apologized to the moderators. He was leaving on his own accord anyways.

[Kingdom]

I tolerated mofo too much. I had hoped that by talking to him privately would have helped him stop but he's beyond that. It gets to a point that, whether it's an internet tough guy act or just an avatar for how you are in life, I can't when certain lines are crossed. I personally don't care when people bicker or argue or debate intelligently about religion or politics, the two biggest apparent taboo topics anymore, because I don't actually care about each subject. Unfortunately it just takes one person to ruin it for everyone else. I think everyone here can see that Leo and Mach debate everything little thing, without resorting to even basic name calling. But there's always that one person. I honestly don't think we have anyone here that would be THAT person. Lynch is extremely sexist and narrow minded but has avoided crossing the line. That Thomas fellow was clearly someone's dupe. Other than that, we have a good group of people and it's largely always been that way. When a major situation has arisen, things were handled in a very fair manner if you ask me. Not counting spammers, we've always handled things as a team rather than just me decided to get rid of a member.

[NYgiantsfan5689]

Mission is gone??

[NYgiantsfan5689]

Also, the oJuan Pierre of posters 😂😂😂 /dies

[Tobywan]

Mission is gone??

Well, he only seems to pop his head in like 2 times a year.

[NYgiantsfan5689]

Thats upsetting. Is he no longer in charge?

[Trendy Bastard]

He's still the head hancho. We have to execute all options to contact him when we're in need of something.

[Kingdom]

I stay in contact with him on Facebook.