Diamond Dave, speaking of good music, I was in your neck of the woods at the Weinberg Center for the arts this past Monday Night, the band Ratdog put on quite a musical display. Ever heard of the place?
Diamond Dave, speaking of good music, I was in your neck of the woods at the Weinberg Center for the arts this past Monday Night, the band Ratdog put on quite a musical display. Ever heard of the place?
YES!!!...
Weinberg is on Patrick Street.. downtown by Market street.. good area....
I have been there watching plays and even (gasp) a ballet with my kids....
One of my favorite bars is right around the corner from there on Market Street
Originally Posted by Porter99
I took a listen...
This is evidently from MTV's unplugged series.. and they hired some studio musicians/band to attempt to play music behind this guy...
The singer, Jayz or whatever, is about as comprehendable as Bob Dylan with a gag in his mouth... the band does not flow with his lyrics or his style.... and I don't think the people in the backup band were that good anyway...
And how many attacks can he throw towards other performers in his ungodly rants??
This was a waste of a download.. and is now rightfully deleted
Hey, where did you download it from?
Just a little mp3 server that I know of... small subscription service... run by someone I know
Blah.. small subscription means money, and that's money I don't have..
Just for arguments sake, how is sampling different than somebody paying a band to play (ie: the band is not part of the songwriting process)?Originally Posted by DiamondDave
The music itself was still played by somebody originally.
You could argue what is the difference between a hip hop artist putting together a track and Mozart composing a symphany. Both are putting together sounds played by other musicians to make a body of work.
I'm not saying you have to like anything, but critisize the end product, not the process.
HOW IS IT DIFFERENT??
Are you serious??
Taking RECORDED music actually played by someone else, and reusing it is supposedly making music?? PUH-LEASE
You popping a cd in your player and hitting play, pause, play... is not making music... and neither is sampling
So what if they had robots that played 'traditional' instruments? Would that make it more appealing to you?Originally Posted by DiamondDave
If the robots were self aware, creative, and cogniscient.. I'd say yes...
But since they are not.. it is a moot point
sampling and creating beats is much, much more difficult than you make it sound. its a difficult process that takes a lot of skill and a keen musical ear, just like playing any other instrument. just because theyre not creating the music via a piece of wood, some strings and an amplifier doesn't mean its not music.
for reference's sake, i play bass guitar and also create beats via my computer for a band. and playing bass guitar is MUCH easier. i know the difficulty of beat-making isnt the issue at the center of this debate, but you're overlooking some of the skill involved
It's hard to rip a phone book in 1/2 widthwise too... it don't make the sound it makes music
so what you're saying, in essence, is...
those guys who play glasses of water by tapping spoons onto the glass are in fact "musicians," because they're physically doing it with their hands?
but someone who uses various elements of music like samples and drum machines to compile a musically coherent and appealing song is not?
that may be your opinion, and thats fine...
but music is music, no matter how its created... to suggest otherwise is ignorant
music is created by the person playing it... not the person playing the sample or cd of the person who is playing it