Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

  1. #1
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    For the past two days all I have heard is how good it would be for the Rays to get Barry Bonds. From Jim Rome to Colin Cowherd to Buster Olney. They say it will bring in fans and generate more income. They say it might be the one thing to get them over 81 games for the first time. One point they are overlooking is that the Rays have just finished an offseason in which they finally have things going in the right direction and have traded away their troublemakers (Young,Dukes). If you just got rid of your troublemakers, why bring in the biggest one of all. I take that back. Dukes has done far worse things than Bonds but you get my point. Listen to what the Giants players are saying this spring with no Bonds in camp. They feel more freedom and more relaxed than in years past. That's no knock on Bonds but its simply the truth. No more media hovering over them and constantly drilling them with questions about Barry. No more commanding presence in the locker room. The Rays are just lie the Giants are this season, very youthful. Why ruin what should be a much improved team with a media tornado that sucks everyone around in to the steroid cloud?

    Another question you have to ask yourself is why not give the younger guys (everyone on the team) the necessary ABs to get better? Gomes and Baldelli should be DHing along with Cliff Floyd. Baldelli and Floyd have more upside than a 44 year old Bonds. Justin Ruggiano needs to come up and play RF at some point. Bonds would be blocking a lot of the future of this team not to mention disrupting a young teams environment with media coverage by the hundreds instead of dozens.

    I'm not knocking Bonds but I do think his time is up in this game. Last season I wanted the Giants to get Soriano or Carlos Lee over Barry did want Bonds to break the record in a Giants uniform in some way. He did that and us Giants fans appreciate everything he did on a ball field since his coming here in 1993. He saved the franchise and we can never repay him for that. But Bonds' time should be up. The game is trying to get over this steroid cloud and more on. Bonds will only keep the bad memories fresh and Pedro Gomez employed. Did I evenmention Bonds was indicted on federal charges of perjury?

  2. #2
    New York Yankee Hater!!!! mntwinsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Denver Colorado
    Posts
    4,223
    MLB ERA
    7.81

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Bonds will be a good fit in a Ray uniform. Without question it will brings fans to the games and the win total will be above 81. I would love to see Bonds hit some game winning home runs to beat the Yankee's and Red Sox's. DH him 75% of the time and I believe his homer total will be above 40. Rest of the time let him play LF, I would keep him off all astro turf, to keep the knee's in good shape. Tropicana Field is a hitters park correct?
    KBSL - Atlanta Hawks
    Arizona gm - MSL

  3. #3
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Tropicana is regarded as a pitcher's park according to the park factor. It's pretty much a neutral field.

  4. #4
    Hall of Famer DravenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,324
    MLB ERA
    5.00

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    No team really needs Bonds.
    "For someone who was never meant for this world, I must confess I'm suddenly having a hard time leaving it. Of course, they say every atom in our bodies was once part of a star. Maybe I'm not leaving... maybe I'm going home."

  5. #5
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Love him or hate him, but for Bonds to not retire as a San Francisco Giant is like having Michael Jordan not retire as a Chicago Bull.

  6. #6
    Hall of Famer DravenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,324
    MLB ERA
    5.00

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Depends on which retirement.
    "For someone who was never meant for this world, I must confess I'm suddenly having a hard time leaving it. Of course, they say every atom in our bodies was once part of a star. Maybe I'm not leaving... maybe I'm going home."

  7. #7
    Who knew we could win? Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's
    Posts
    18,178
    MLB ERA
    4.59
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    For the past two days all I have heard is how good it would be for the Rays to get Barry Bonds. From Jim Rome to Colin Cowherd to Buster Olney. They say it will bring in fans and generate more income. They say it might be the one thing to get them over 81 games for the first time. One point they are overlooking is that the Rays have just finished an offseason in which they finally have things going in the right direction and have traded away their troublemakers (Young,Dukes). If you just got rid of your troublemakers, why bring in the biggest one of all. I take that back. Dukes has done far worse things than Bonds but you get my point. Listen to what the Giants players are saying this spring with no Bonds in camp. They feel more freedom and more relaxed than in years past. That's no knock on Bonds but its simply the truth. No more media hovering over them and constantly drilling them with questions about Barry. No more commanding presence in the locker room. The Rays are just lie the Giants are this season, very youthful. Why ruin what should be a much improved team with a media tornado that sucks everyone around in to the steroid cloud?

    Another question you have to ask yourself is why not give the younger guys (everyone on the team) the necessary ABs to get better? Gomes and Baldelli should be DHing along with Cliff Floyd. Baldelli and Floyd have more upside than a 44 year old Bonds. Justin Ruggiano needs to come up and play RF at some point. Bonds would be blocking a lot of the future of this team not to mention disrupting a young teams environment with media coverage by the hundreds instead of dozens.

    I'm not knocking Bonds but I do think his time is up in this game. Last season I wanted the Giants to get Soriano or Carlos Lee over Barry did want Bonds to break the record in a Giants uniform in some way. He did that and us Giants fans appreciate everything he did on a ball field since his coming here in 1993. He saved the franchise and we can never repay him for that. But Bonds' time should be up. The game is trying to get over this steroid cloud and more on. Bonds will only keep the bad memories fresh and Pedro Gomez employed. Did I evenmention Bonds was indicted on federal charges of perjury?
    There are legit reasons to why Bonds shouldn't be on the Rays. But you have to look on the business side of things and his fit on the roster. On the business side, Tampa Bay is one of the lowest grossing teams when it comes to tickets sales. Have they really had a superstar on the national level? McGriff? Past his prime. No one recognizes Wade Boggs as a D-Ray. Just the signing of Bonds would add much needed revenue to try and get out of that bomb of a stadium named after a fruit juice. As for the fit on the roster, the Rays are extremely young and they need a veteran presence to help them learn the ropes of the ML. You know pitchers will respect him at the plate still. Why wouldn't you want to learn from a guy that knowledgeable at the plate?
    2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)

    TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
    MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
    TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)

  8. #8
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Well, if you're arguing that Bonds would be a good fit in Tampa, he would be a good fit anywhere. Heck, even the L.A. Dodgers, considering the Dodgers' owner loves to squeeze every penny out of the fans' pocket.

  9. #9
    Brewers/Steelers Fan!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,609
    MLB ERA
    5.52

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Just hope the Rays dont get that desperate.

  10. #10
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    The Rays have a veteran presence on this team already in Carlos Pena. Pena also hit 48 homeruns last year. On the business side it makes sense but this team is on the right track now and to screw that up by bringing in the most hated man in baseball doesn't help. Another thing, what is the one thing Bonds hasn't done in baseball? The man wants a ring and Tampa isn't going to give that to him. If the Rays put a winning product on the field, people will come. Right now, they are well on their way in doing that.

  11. #11
    Who knew we could win? Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's
    Posts
    18,178
    MLB ERA
    4.59
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    The Rays have a veteran presence on this team already in Carlos Pena. Pena also hit 48 homeruns last year. On the business side it makes sense but this team is on the right track now and to screw that up by bringing in the most hated man in baseball doesn't help. Another thing, what is the one thing Bonds hasn't done in baseball? The man wants a ring and Tampa isn't going to give that to him. If the Rays put a winning product on the field, people will come. Right now, they are well on their way in doing that.
    How long has Pena been in the League? Before he hit those 48 HRs, he was a fringe player that got traded by Oakland and cut by Detroit.
    2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)

    TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
    MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
    TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)

  12. #12
    Brewers/Steelers Fan!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,609
    MLB ERA
    5.52

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Still with a young team and with some quality talent, why risk the chance of distrubing the 'chemistry" (with roids cloud hanging over Bonds' head).

    I say stay away Rays!!!

  13. #13

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    The Rays definitely don't need Bonds. I like their direction.

  14. #14
    Brewers/Steelers Fan!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,609
    MLB ERA
    5.52

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    I like it as well!!! Rays are the up and team in the AL and maybe the majors, IMO!

  15. #15

    Re: Why the Rays don't need Bonds

    Quote Originally Posted by brewersfan19 View Post
    I like it as well!!! Rays are the up and team in the AL and maybe the majors, IMO!
    I say they will be in 4th place this year.

    1st:Yankees
    2nd:Red Sox
    3rd: Blue Jays
    4th: Rays
    5th: Orioles

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •