Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

  1. #1
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    San Diego Padres, Rob Mackowiak, Major League Baseball - CBSSports.com

    On an unrelated note, I don't like sportsline.com's new look
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  2. #2
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    It's a big surprise since they were saying a couple of days ago they were going to pick it up. No real loss though.

  3. #3
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Not a surprise to the fans down here...........and it frees up 3m to be better utilized......maybe in signing Loretta to challege for the starting job at 2nd.....


    Great move
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  4. #4
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Anyone interested in signing Curt Schilling to a 1-year deal?
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  5. #5
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    I wouldn't mind it.

    I'd definitely be for it if Maddux doesn't pick up his option. (I'm assuming the Padres have every intention of picking up the option, but it's a mutual one so Greg has to agree)
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  6. #6
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    How long does Greg have to either accept or decline his option?
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  7. #7
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Honestly, I don't know and I don't know where to go to look that up.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  8. #8
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    According to Schilling's website, San Diego is on his list of teams he would consider playing for next season. He's only wanting a one year deal and I think he makes the Padres' pitching staff that much stronger. Can you imagine a rotation with Jake Peavy, Chris Young, Greg Maddux and Curt Schilling? Should make us the favorites in the NL West, no question about it.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  9. #9
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    I wouldn't jump to the conclusion of us being "favorites" if Torre cause the Dodgers to be able to pick up A-Rod, Mariano, and Pettite, but that'd definitely be a good rotation.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  10. #10
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Schilling..........no thanks...........If Maddux doesn't come back for some reason, that's 10m to add a frontline younger arm for years to come........no need to do the overpriced 1 year rental of the old ass guy with they way we're financially situated.........we're finally in a spot to actually sign quality guys to multi-year deals.......so no thanks
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  11. #11
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    what "frontline younger arm for years to come" is available? And for only 10 mil per year, no less?
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000

  12. #12
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo View Post
    I wouldn't jump to the conclusion of us being "favorites" if Torre cause the Dodgers to be able to pick up A-Rod, Mariano, and Pettite, but that'd definitely be a good rotation.
    Pettite has already said it's the Yankees or retirement, so you can count out the Dodgers. I think it's a HUGE mistake for them to sign ARod to the kind of money he's looking for and as for Rivera, he'll retire a Yankee so scratch him out as well.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  13. #13
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo View Post
    what "frontline younger arm for years to come" is available? And for only 10 mil per year, no less?
    You're right.....I should have specified better.......but I consider a #2-3 rotation armx still frontline ......

    I would think plenty of tough #2-3 type arms could be had for less than 10m......especially if we move on this now and don't wait to get someone locked up......the long we wait, the more those spots will make (obviously).....

    I did NOT mean to imply "ace" or "#1" by using the term "frontline"......if thats how it came across in text sorry.......

    And if we don't bring back Maddux, and don't sign Schilling, I'd much rather see that money offered to Peavy NOW while he's still under control and not that close to FA.......longterm financial security will appeal to him from an injury standpoint, and keeping him longterm in a Padres uni appeals to .......well.........everyone associated with the Padres from fans to FO.........Even if we keep Maddux, I'd like to see them look to get this done this year, again the longer they wait the more they will pay. Get this done before a guy like Santana hits FA.
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres

  14. #14
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    I'd agree with you if Schilling was looking for a multi-year deal, but he's only looking for a 1-year. I don't think that's too much too actually think about. You bring a guy of his caliber on board and you just made this pitching staff that much stronger behind Peavy, CY, Maddux and possibly Clement or Hensley.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State

  15. #15
    Teams of Greatness BoSox34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Shelbyville, KY
    Posts
    838
    AA ERA
    3.07

    Re: Padres decline Mackowiak's option. (I know, big surprise)

    Schilling is going to want atleast the same as he made last season, which was around $13 million. But, as was being mentioned above, it's good to know that he isn't wanting anything more than a one year deal or that's what he has said atleast. I think he would compliment Peavy and Maddux very well in the Padres rotation and it will only help him pitching in the NL.
    "They asked me if I wanted the ball in Game 6, and I said yes. I'll always say yes. That's what I did with Jack McKeon. I told him, 'Let me see how I feel tomorrow.' I went out, did a long toss, came in and said, 'I'll pitch, I want it, I want to do it.' And it ended up working out." -Josh Beckett

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •