Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: Padres looking to trade Klesko, Vinny

  1. 07-12-2006 12:51 AM #16
    OBBoltsFan
    OBBoltsFan is offline
    Mid 90's velocity OBBoltsFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    345
    MLB ERA
    0.69
    Quote Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports...s11padres.html

    names mentioned in the article are Bill Hall, Corey Koskie, Wilson Betimet, and Andy Marte. Says a move will more than likely have to include Kotteras.
    Why in the hell would the Indians want to trade Marte? Granted, I'd cream myself over a Kotteras + Schmucks for Marte deal, but I just don't see why a low budget team would trade their best prospect for a prospect whose position is firmly fulfilled already by Victor Martinez.
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  2. 07-13-2006 01:26 PM #17
    HollywoodLeo
    HollywoodLeo is offline
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    I didn't want this thread with it's information, to be locked. So I moved the discussion I wanted to lock to its own thread.
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  3. 07-13-2006 05:45 PM #18
    love_that_reefer
    love_that_reefer is offline
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    Couldn't have a chance Leo but weay to go with the Zimmerman thread. Won't let me give a rep point.
    http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/9338/posey.jpg
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  4. 07-13-2006 09:50 PM #19
    Rufio181
    Rufio181 is offline
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Ensberg looks like the more suitable option here.
    http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/ima...logo_white.gif
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  5. 07-18-2006 03:32 PM #20
    FmrFresnan
    FmrFresnan is offline
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Padres

    Quote Originally Posted by Rufio181
    Ensberg looks like the more suitable option here.
    Rufio is right, it looks like the Padres will make a deal for Ensberg once he comes off the DL. He had an MRI yesterday and it showed no structural damage to his shoulder. Yes, he has a .236 BA, but he has an OBP at almost .400 and can hit the ball out of the park with the best of them.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  6. 07-18-2006 03:33 PM #21
    FmrFresnan
    FmrFresnan is offline
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Padres

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
    Couldn't have a chance Leo but weay to go with the Zimmerman thread. Won't let me give a rep point.
    Hey Reefer, here's another opinion you can get offended by...

    Fresno State WILL upset LSU on the road
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  7. 07-18-2006 08:05 PM #22
    Rufio181
    Rufio181 is offline
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan
    Hey Reefer, here's another opinion you can get offended by...

    Fresno State WILL upset LSU on the road
    Perhaps talking about college football?
    http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/ima...logo_white.gif
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  8. 07-19-2006 12:02 AM #23
    HollywoodLeo
    HollywoodLeo is offline
    Administrator HollywoodLeo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
    Posts
    33,336
    MLB ERA
    3.97
    Houston's Morgan Ensberg has been added to the list of third baseman the Padres are evaluating for a possible trade, says the San Diego Union-Tribune.
    http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/MLB_SC-RUMOR
    LeagueTeamyearsRecordWild CardDivisionPennantsTitles
    MSLSan Diego Padres2034-20592,217-1,9951631
    TBLArizona Diamondbacks2005-20181,216-1,0531963
    TSSLSan Diego Padres2015-2021, 2024-20281,017-9280732
    TSSLTexas Rangers2029-2033396-4140000
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  9. 07-19-2006 12:33 AM #24
    Rufio181
    Rufio181 is offline
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Ensberg looks like the more realistic option. Lets bring him back to socal.
    http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/ima...logo_white.gif
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  10. 07-19-2006 11:02 AM #25
    padrefanforever
    padrefanforever is offline
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14
    trading for Ensberg...a guy entering his prime, allstar last year, .280/36/100 potential guy....whew this kind of talk would be considered "wacky" by some....careful you don't insight a riot by showing some hope.........
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  11. 07-19-2006 03:30 PM #26
    padrefanforever
    padrefanforever is offline
    Stoners are worthless padrefanforever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    5,947
    MLB ERA
    6.14
    Vinny was released today
    Bring back the Chicken !!

    Play Ball at Planet Padres
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  12. 07-19-2006 04:37 PM #27
    love_that_reefer
    love_that_reefer is offline
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    Quote Originally Posted by padrefanforever
    trading for Ensberg...a guy entering his prime, allstar last year, .280/36/100 potential guy....whew this kind of talk would be considered "wacky" by some....careful you don't insight a riot by showing some hope.........
    Well considering they have a replacement for Ensberg already there and and he is a FA after this year, its not that wacky. Problem is it wouldn't solve Houston's offensive trouble. Totally different than someone like...I don't know...Zimmerman!!
    http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/9338/posey.jpg
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  13. 07-20-2006 08:25 PM #28
    FmrFresnan
    FmrFresnan is offline
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Padres

    According to the Fox Sports article by Ken Rosenthal, it seems he's of the opinion that the Astros WILL NOT move Ensberg...but we've heard that line before.

    "The Astros are not expected to move Morgan Ensberg, who is on the disabled list with a shoulder injury."
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  14. 07-20-2006 08:29 PM #29
    Rufio181
    Rufio181 is offline
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Quote Originally Posted by FmrFresnan
    According to the Fox Sports article by Ken Rosenthal, it seems he's of the opinion that the Astros WILL NOT move Ensberg...but we've heard that line before.

    "The Astros are not expected to move Morgan Ensberg, who is on the disabled list with a shoulder injury."
    Crap now I have to change my avatar.
    http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/ima...logo_white.gif
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
  15. 07-20-2006 08:30 PM #30
    FmrFresnan
    FmrFresnan is offline
    OC Padre Fan
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    1,689
    Rookie ERA
    12.60

    Padres

    I wouldn't change it just yet Rufio....GM's have said they're not going to move a guy and then 2 weeks later that same guy gets traded.
    FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE

    v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)

    @ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)

    @ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)

    v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)

    @ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)

    @ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)

    v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)

    v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)

    v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)

    @ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)

    v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)

    @ New Mexico State
    Reply With Quote Register To Reply
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules