I guess there have been stranger and more embarrassing managerial searches in baseball history than the one that concluded Friday when the A's rehired Ken Macha.
After all, New York Yankees owner George Steinbrenner set the bar awfully high when he hired Billy Martin five times from 1975 to 1988.
A's general manager Billy Beane and Macha don't quite live in that neighborhood of Dysfunction Junction. Yet in recent A's history, this was as ludicrous as it gets.
I don't have a problem with Beane's ultimate decision to rehire Macha -- nine days after cutting off negotiations -- and give him a three-year contract. Macha deserved a new deal after going 275-211 in three seasons with the A's. The A's, a young and improving team, deserved some stability at the top.
I do, however, have a question:
Why did Beane have to turn negotiations with Macha's agent into such a take-it-or-leave-it game of hardball?
The A's reportedly offered Macha a three-year, $2.625 deal with a $1.2 million team option for a fourth year.
Team Macha countered with a three-year, $3.1 deal with no option.
In other words, they were around $400,000 apart over three years and at odds over an option year.
Anyone's who's read "Baseball Managerial Negotiations for Dummies" knows you can bridge a gap that small in the time it takes Ichiro to go from first to third.
In which chapter of "Moneyball" does it say you have to low-ball your manager? Macha made $620,000 this year. A utility infielder with a lifetime .220 batting average makes more. The Yankees' Joe Torre made $6.1 million this season. The Giants' Felipe Alou made $2 million.
Money equals respect in baseball. A's owners John Fisher, a billionaire, and Lew Wolff could have afforded to throw Macha what amounts to a bone in baseball and avoid this embarrassing soap opera.
Instead, Beane quickly told Macha adios. Macha soon had second thoughts and, basically, came crawling back asking Beane to reconsider.
Was that really necessary? A's managers have to bow down to Beane enough as it is.