Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 80

Thread: Nady might be done for the year

  1. #61
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Not according to percentages, which you clearly don't understand
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  2. #62
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    Funny. I laughed at his rankings too until I saw his top 2 were ESPN's top 2 as well.
    Funny since ESPN had the Marlins at #2 and he didn;t have the Marlins in the top 10 Must not have read his or ESPN's ranking too well.

  3. #63
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    Not according to percentages, which you clearly don't understand
    I understand them just fine. You obviously think striking out at 5% less than Dunn isn't striking out a lot which is utterly sad

  4. #64
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    Funny since ESPN had the Marlins at #2 and he didn;t have the Marlins in the top 10 Must not have read his or ESPN's ranking too well.
    Whoops haha. When I said #1 and #2 I meant #1 and #4
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  5. #65
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    I understand them just fine. You obviously think striking out at 5% less than Dunn isn't striking out a lot which is utterly sad
    That's a 20% difference, when 27% is the highest and 22% is the percent in question.

    That absolutely is a big difference
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  6. #66
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    That's a 5% difference. Swisher strikes out 142 times on average. That's a lot

  7. #67
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    It's not a 5% difference. It's a 20% difference. 5 (the difference between 22 and 27) is about 1/5 of 27. 1/5 translates to 20%. Therefore it's about 20% difference between 27% and 22%.

    MATH
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  8. #68
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year


  9. #69
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    last season Dunn struck out 164 (CIN 120 + AZ 44) times in 651 PA (464 + 187), which is 25.19 percent of the time (164 / 651 x 100).

    last season Swisher struck out 135 times in 588 PA, which is 22.95 percent of the time (135 / 588 x 100).

    25.19% - 22.95% = 2.24% difference in strikeout rate. If Swisher maintained his k rate and had as many PA as Dunn, then he would have struck out 149 times vs Dunn's 164. They both strike out a lot with Dunn striking out slightly more.

    Nick Swisher Statistics and History - Baseball-Reference.com
    Adam Dunn Statistics and History - Baseball-Reference.com

    just counting ABs it's 31.72% vs. 27.16% for a 4.56% difference.

  10. #70
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    I'm talkin career numbers, or at least the last 3, not just last year
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  11. #71
    Old Style Drinker
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2,088
    MLB ERA
    3.74

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    i cant believe you guys are arguing over this stuff. Regardless, both of their strikeout rates sucks.

    and statistically speaking, a player will come closer to his career mean, the more PA he has. Its just the way statistics work.
    The art of being an engineer: packing 10 lbs of crap into a 5 lb box.

    "If Hooter's fell, for all practical purposes the world was lost." Von Neumann's War
    http://www.myspace.com/rockinray1

  12. #72
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by rockin500 View Post
    i cant believe you guys are arguing over this stuff. Regardless, both of their strikeout rates sucks.
    Exactly!! They both are piss poor!

  13. #73
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by Providence A's View Post

    just counting ABs it's 31.72% vs. 27.16% for a 4.56% difference.
    Just round that up to 5% difference which would somehow turn into 20%.

  14. #74
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Swisher has almost half as many PA as Dunn using their career numbers. 26.3906% vs. 21.3779%,which is a 5% difference. They both strike out a ton. 171.5289 k's vs. 138.95635 k's at that rate for 650 PAs. Dunn is also a lot more productive than Swisher (.902 career OPS vs. .816). Baseball reference has their 162 game average for k's as 180 vs. 142.

  15. #75
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Yep, both strikeout rates are horrendous. Can't see how anymore could be said on the subject.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •