Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 80

Thread: Nady might be done for the year

  1. #31
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by browntown653 View Post
    Also, Swisher is 28 years old...so I dare I say there's a slight possibility, just slightly that Swisher's best days are ahead of him? I know it sounds crazy that Swisher is a good player, I know it must be an utterly insane statement...well, I guess I'm crazy.
    Going off his career numbers and watching him play, it is an insane thing to say he is "good".

  2. #32
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Alright well then let's take my bet
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  3. #33
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Of course it does. First off, you didn't prove anything. All you did was prove he doesn't strike out at the same rate as Dunn with less to go on. He does strike out a lot so given more plate appearances, he will strike out even more and at a higher rate. That's the type of ballplayer he is, all or nothing just like Dunn. News flash, striking out 21% of the time is not good.

  4. #34
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    I never said his strikeout rate was good. I said he strikes out less than Dunn.
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  5. #35
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    You said that you proved he doesn't strike out a lot which is the farthest thing from the truth.

  6. #36
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    Wanna make a bet on it? We'll set the over/under at 25% of his plate appearances this year he strikes out. You take over, I'll take under
    I will take the bet that Swisher will strike out 23.9% of his plate appearances. That is the average of Dunn's and Swisher's averages.

  7. #37
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Alright I can do that. Write it down CJ
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  8. #38
    Starter bcshorts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Beckley, WV
    Posts
    353
    MLB ERA
    0.61

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    I'm trying to figure out how the strikeout rate is going to increase a couple of percentage points because he gets an extra 25 (?) at-bats. I'm missing the rationale on this. Someone please explain to a por dum hilbily lik me.

    You guys do know he played in 150 and 153 games the last two seasons, right?

  9. #39
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by bcshorts View Post
    I'm trying to figure out how the strikeout rate is going to increase a couple of percentage points because he gets an extra 25 (?) at-bats. I'm missing the rationale on this. Someone please explain to a por dum hilbily lik me.

    You guys do know he played in 150 and 153 games the last two seasons, right?
    THANK YOU. The logic is getting by me too
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  10. #40
    Hall of Famer ljshorty89's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bellmore, NY
    Posts
    6,126
    MLB ERA
    3.18

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    It's PERCENTAGE. Games shouldn't matter. Percentage is the same whether you K 150 out of 500 times, or 50 out of 160ish.

  11. #41
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    More chances to strikeout at a higher rate. Really not that hard when you consider the kind of hitter he is. He could 0-4 with 3 K's in a game raising the %. And its plate appearances, not games.

  12. #42
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Dunn averages around 30 more plate appearances than Swisher and around 30 more strikeouts.

  13. #43
    Hall of Famer cjkalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Boston (Go to ND currently)
    Posts
    5,297
    MLB ERA
    4.40

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by NYgiantsfan5689 View Post
    THANK YOU. The logic is getting by me too
    Well actually Swisher will strike out more in the pitcher talented AL East so i think thats a factor not yet considered
    LeagueTeamDivision TitlesWild CardWS WinsYears as GM
    MSLSeattle0001

    Seattle GM since July 2065
    Royals GM since January 2005

    Oakland GM in MSL History
    3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series

    RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs

  14. #44
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by love_that_reefer View Post
    More chances to strikeout at a higher rate. Really not that hard when you consider the kind of hitter he is. He could 0-4 with 3 K's in a game raising the %. And its plate appearances, not games.
    You don't get "more chances to strikeout at a higher rate." That statement makes no sense. You get either 4 AB's in a game to strikeout 3 times, or you get 4 AB's in 4 games, but you can still strikeout 3 times in those 4 games. Your argument is making no logical sense
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

  15. #45
    Pay me in gum NYgiantsfan5689's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    9,126
    MLB ERA
    2.68

    Re: Nady might be done for the year

    Quote Originally Posted by cjkalt View Post
    Well actually Swisher struck out last year at a 27.2% of his AB's last year and played full time so I expect a similar % this year.
    You have to go by plate appearances and not AB's. AB's don't include walks, which is a huge part of Swisher's game. He struck out in 23% of his plate appearances last year. He struck out in 19.8% of his plate appearances the year before. Both in full time playing.
    Quote Originally Posted by missionhockey21 View Post
    Life: Its gots to be funky.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •