Of course it does. First off, you didn't prove anything. All you did was prove he doesn't strike out at the same rate as Dunn with less to go on. He does strike out a lot so given more plate appearances, he will strike out even more and at a higher rate. That's the type of ballplayer he is, all or nothing just like Dunn. News flash, striking out 21% of the time is not good.
You said that you proved he doesn't strike out a lot which is the farthest thing from the truth.
I'm trying to figure out how the strikeout rate is going to increase a couple of percentage points because he gets an extra 25 (?) at-bats. I'm missing the rationale on this. Someone please explain to a por dum hilbily lik me.
You guys do know he played in 150 and 153 games the last two seasons, right?
It's PERCENTAGE. Games shouldn't matter. Percentage is the same whether you K 150 out of 500 times, or 50 out of 160ish.
More chances to strikeout at a higher rate. Really not that hard when you consider the kind of hitter he is. He could 0-4 with 3 K's in a game raising the %. And its plate appearances, not games.
Dunn averages around 30 more plate appearances than Swisher and around 30 more strikeouts.
League Team Division Titles Wild Card WS Wins Years as GM MSL Seattle 0 0 0 1
Seattle GM since July 2065
Royals GM since January 2005
Oakland GM in MSL History
3 Division Titles (4 Wild Card Berths) 1 World Series
RIP TBSL Los Angeles Angels 2012 WS Champs
You don't get "more chances to strikeout at a higher rate." That statement makes no sense. You get either 4 AB's in a game to strikeout 3 times, or you get 4 AB's in 4 games, but you can still strikeout 3 times in those 4 games. Your argument is making no logical sense