Originally Posted by
HollywoodLeo
Notice how it was one half of the centerpiece of your argument that I focused on?
Would you call a player who hit 42 HRs, 109 RBIs, .543 slugging worthless and somebody the team is better off without if he didn't strike out a lot?
I mean, I guess you never really called him worthless, but I'm simply answering your initial question. THATis what he never recovered from (to get back to)
You didn't flat out call him worthless, but you pretty much implied it by scoffing at the notion that there was something for him to get back to.