Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Spivey for Ohka

  1. #1
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77

    Spivey for Ohka

    http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/p...=.jsp&c_id=was

    Frank Robinson doesn't **** around. Ohka acted like a baby and Frank said adios. Good for the Nationals even though Ohka wasn't doing that bad. Brewers get another arm and the Nats get a nice temporary replacement for Vidro. After Baerga's blunder last night, I guess they needed a change.

  2. #2
    Hall of Famer awefullspellare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Posts
    2,653
    AA ERA
    12.63
    Like this trade for the Nats. Good to see a manger not taking crap from a player.
    I aim to try
    "Nothing is what rocks dream of."-Aristotle

  3. #3
    De Facto Baseball God
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    22,208
    MLB ERA
    5.77
    They also acquired Ryan Drese off waivers today. Bust day for the first place Nats.

  4. #4
    Nice to see Nats do something.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  5. #5
    Hall of Famer McKain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,137
    MLB ERA
    1.34
    When Vidro comes back, they should move Spivey to short.

    He might not be able to play there, but hell, can't be any worse than Guzman.

  6. #6
    Furcals Designated Driver realmofotalk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    16,526
    MLB ERA
    2.63
    Blog Entries
    5
    Nats give up one of their starting pitchers for a backup 2b. Bad trade for the Nats, tho Ohka will probably blow as a Brewer.

  7. #7
    Can Spivey top a .457 OPS while not losing that much on D? If so, move him to SS.
    http://strike3forums.com/forums/phot...pelbon2006.jpg


    Then out of fairness to the others you will be Slagathor.

  8. #8
    Future PGA Tour Golfer DirtyKash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    13,057
    MLB ERA
    1.63
    Blog Entries
    14
    Milwaukee's rotation might be the most underrated in baseball?

    V. Santos 2-5, 2.74
    C. Capuano 5-5, 3.40
    T. Ohka 4-3, 3.33
    B. Sheets 2-5, 3.65
    D. Davis 8-5, 3.68

  9. #9
    Yep. When

    A) Ben Sheets has the second highest ERA in the rotation
    and
    B) Your worst ERA is 3.68

    It's a damn good rotation. Tough luck, although my boy Douggie Fresh has 8 wins.
    http://strike3forums.com/forums/phot...pelbon2006.jpg


    Then out of fairness to the others you will be Slagathor.

  10. #10
    Who knew we could win? Porter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's
    Posts
    18,178
    MLB ERA
    4.59
    Blog Entries
    8
    This was a good deal for both teams, assuming they do move Spivey to SS when Vidro is back. You cant get worse than Guzman at SS.....wait we had Valdez........anyways Okha will continue to have as solid season for the Brewers who all of a sudden have one of the most solid 1-5 rotations in baseball.
    2003 Hybrid World Champion (115-47 reg season, 11-4 playoffs)

    TBL: Anaheim Angels 2006-present (238-244 regular season, 1 division title)
    MSL: St Louis Cardinals 2013-present (2734-2936 regular season, 5 division titles, 2 championships)
    TSSL: Seattle Mariners 2006-2029, Pittsburgh Pirates 2030-present (209-277, 5 division titles w/SEA, 1 championship w/SEA)

  11. #11
    Hall of Famer Steak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Place where you can dump Uranium (NJ)
    Posts
    2,323
    AA ERA
    12.42
    I think the Brew Crew got the better end of that deal.

    Ohka is a good pitcher. He can complement the Brewers starting rotation. What happened to him with Frank Robinson was unfortunate. It shouldn't have happened.

  12. #12
    Hall of Famer Steak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Place where you can dump Uranium (NJ)
    Posts
    2,323
    AA ERA
    12.42
    Quote Originally Posted by McKain
    He might not be able to play there, but hell, can't be any worse than Guzman.
    I had no idea what the Nats were thinking overpaying Guzman in the first place. His numbers have declined badly after he made the All-Star Team in 2001. It's really sad how everything has fallen for him. Guzman was a must-see player to watch when the Twins acquired him in 1998. It's too bad things fell apart for him.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •