Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: Andrew Jones Claimed On Waivers

  1. #16
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Red Sox. Correction, the Boston Red Sox

  2. #17
    Token White Guy Dam8610's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,954
    MLB ERA
    2.89
    Quote Originally Posted by Rufio181
    Red Sox. Correction, the Boston Red Sox
    Did they claim him? Because I honestly wouldn't be at all surprised if the White Sox claimed him.
    http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/1526/jenkssigya5.jpg

    Carlos Quentin for MVP!

    (\__/)
    (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.

  3. #18
    Teams of Greatness BoSox34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Shelbyville, KY
    Posts
    838
    AA ERA
    3.07
    If the Red Sox were the team that claimed him, the Braves might be trying to do something similar to what the Phillies did with Bobby Abreu. Take less in return but find a team with a large market that can absorb the full length of Jones' contract for the rest of this season and the next.

    Now in essence, Bobby Abreu cost a bit more financially and produced less than Jones this season, but with Jones being due the 10-5 rule sometime this month, they may figure this is there best shot to trade him somewhere of their choice, yet find a team to eat his contract being that the Braves have been talking about slicing their payroll all season.

    The only thing that doesnt make sense is why wouldn't they have done the trade Boston offered pre-trade deadline? At that time the Sox were offering Crisp and Hansen, maybe it had to do with the Sox wanting part of Jones' contract payed for. But, anything is a guess up to this point.

    But, as many have said I doubt anything will come of this. Just thought I may throw that out there.
    "They asked me if I wanted the ball in Game 6, and I said yes. I'll always say yes. That's what I did with Jack McKeon. I told him, 'Let me see how I feel tomorrow.' I went out, did a long toss, came in and said, 'I'll pitch, I want it, I want to do it.' And it ended up working out." -Josh Beckett

  4. #19
    You're saying it like Andruw's numbers have taken a huge dive, like Abreu's, and we just want to be rid of him.


    Andruw's our best player. We aren't the Phillies, we don't just give good players away.


    And just so there's no mistakes here, Andruw >>>> Abreu.
    "Players can't get better over time." -GiantsFanatic

  5. #20
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Quote Originally Posted by Dam8610
    Did they claim him? Because I honestly wouldn't be at all surprised if the White Sox claimed him.
    Not sure, that's just my guess. You asked which Sox team and I said the Red Sox.

  6. #21
    Hall of Famer DravenX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,324
    MLB ERA
    5.00
    ESPN.com is reporting that a club was awarded Jones on waivers Thursday. The Braves have until Saturday afternoon to either make a deal or pull Jones off waivers. If he's pulled off waivers, he can't be traded this season.
    http://atlanta.braves.mlb.com/NASApp...=.jsp&c_id=atl

    I just read on the Braves fan forum on the Braves website that the Cubs claimed Jones. Anyone have prove of this?
    "For someone who was never meant for this world, I must confess I'm suddenly having a hard time leaving it. Of course, they say every atom in our bodies was once part of a star. Maybe I'm not leaving... maybe I'm going home."

  7. #22
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    The Braves are in an interesting situation, will they keep Jones- the face of the team, or trade him for top prospects, more notably pitching.

  8. #23
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08
    it wouldn't be for top prospects as said prospects can't be on the 40 man roster IIRC and would need to clear waivers as well.

    also, if for some reason the Braves took Jones off waivers and put him back on a 2nd time, he would be automatically lost to a team that won the claim the 2nd time.

    see here

    But when a player is placed on waivers a second time, the claim is irrevocable. Thus any claiming team owns the rights and a trade must be completed.

  9. #24
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Quote Originally Posted by Providence A's
    it wouldn't be for top prospects as said prospects can't be on the 40 man roster IIRC and would need to clear waivers as well.

    also, if for some reason the Braves took Jones off waivers and put him back on a 2nd time, he would be automatically lost to a team that won the claim the 2nd time.

    see here
    Well it could be for pitching. I think that's what the Braves need most. Starting pitching and relief pitching.

  10. #25
    Brewers/Steelers Fan!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,609
    MLB ERA
    5.52

    Brewers

    If it was the Cubs, who in the hell would Atlanta want.... Cubs arent getting rid of D. Lee. Maybe Pierre, hahahahahaha, NOT!!!!! They arent great fans in Atlanta, but they may burn down the stadium if they did that... Maybe Prior and/or Wood, seems like the Braves take a lot of ptichers and turn them around into solid pitchers. Who knows, they probable just don't want the White Sox to get him....

  11. #26
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08
    again, the players that would be traded would also have to clear waivers. Do you honestly believe Lee, Pierre, Prior, or Wood would clear waivers?

  12. #27
    movin on up! jasonshortstop2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    44
    Rookie ERA
    4.89
    it was probally to astros... as odd as that seems the astros need offense the braves need pitching

    jones for owswalt

  13. #28
    Brewers/Steelers Fan!!!
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    9,609
    MLB ERA
    5.52

    Brewers

    Lee never would, but with the others I was just trying to be funny.. Cause Jones is in such a higher class that Pierre and Prior/Wood is just a comedy show in the Chicago area...

    I know about the waiver trading process, I was just having a good laugh, but apparently I was the only chuckling.....

  14. #29
    Hook 'em Rufio181's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,022
    MLB ERA
    3.44
    Quote Originally Posted by jasonshortstop2
    it was probally to astros... as odd as that seems the astros need offense the braves need pitching

    jones for owswalt
    I dont see the Astros trading him. Supposedly they were taking offers for him and Roy wasn't to happy about that. The least thing you want to do is do it again to your player.

  15. #30
    RIP Cyan 2000 - 2017 Providence A's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    PVD for now.
    Posts
    26,602
    MLB ERA
    3.08
    oh, ok...sorry, I didn't pick up on that I guess...I just don't think the Braves will be able to get enough for a deal to happen due to the process it has to go through now...assuming that they even want to deal him.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •