I think it is time we change our thought process as Reds fans. We have been so brainwashed into thinking the Reds cannot afford to pay their star players that we have lost touch with reality. We have gotten to the point where we just unflinchingly accept a low payroll and the loss of our good players to free agency. It doesn't have to be that way. I have seen independent studies showing the Reds and most other teams are making a profit. There is no reason the Reds should not be able to keep Adam Dunn AND go out and splurge for some free agent talent in the offseason.
Even if the Reds as a business were to lose a few million dollars per year in terms of net profit it could be a prudent business model if they are a contending team. The reason is because having a winning team builds a larger fan base, increases long-term ticket sales and merchandise (jerseys, pennants, hats, posters, etc) sales. Most importantly it increases the value of the franchise, and this is where the bulk of an owner's profit comes from. Owners make their money when they sell the team rather than from year-to-year profits.
For example, say I buy the team for $200 million, then operate the team for 10 years at an average loss of $4 million per year (total loss $40 million), then I sell the team for $300 million. I have made a net profit of $60 million even though the team lost millions of dollars every year that I owned it! The values of franchises really are growing that fast in reality and have been for years. So you can see how Castellini can make money by increasing the payroll. On the other hand, if the team sinks into perennial mediocrity the value of the team will not rise nearly as quickly and could even lose value.
In marketing this is called building a winning brand for your company. You can operate a company at a loss as long as you are growing the company and building it into a business someone will be willing to pay a large sum of money for later.
I hold out hope the penny-pinching was due to Carl Lindner rather than economic necessity. I hold out hope that Castellini will increase the payroll when the time is right -- maybe even dramatically increase it. The time will be right when the FO believes we can make a run for the World Series. This will come when the nucleus of home-grown players is good enough that one or two key additions of proven veteran stars can put the team into legitimate Series contention. This could be as soon as 2009. Votto, Bailey, Bruce, Stubbs, etc should be viable regulars that when combined with Dunn, Harang, Arroyo, Hamilton, Encarnacion and Phillips could be a very solid contending team. Add a star or two to that mix (a shortstop, a catcher and a closer?) and there is no reason why the Reds couldn't win the World Series.
Castellini is a competitive person who wants to win. Lindner was just a caretaker owner who felt he was doing the people of Cincinnati a favor by stewarding the team and making sure it didn't leave town (which would never happen). He didn't really care about winning and he didn't know a thing about baseball. Castellini does.
Let's change our thought process regarding the payroll. Let's not give the ownership of the Reds a free pass to go cheap on the payroll. We should expect Castellini to put up the money to field a competitive team. We should not take the "small market" excuse without a fight!