No offense??? How about Dunn? Unless you were referring to the future...Originally Posted by Saber
No offense??? How about Dunn? Unless you were referring to the future...Originally Posted by Saber
rf28
Bailey for Webb? What are you guys crazy? No way do you trade Bailey, he should be absolutely untouchable.
If he had advanced secondary pitches I would agree. The only way I would trade Bailey was if we got back a starter to anchor the staff, has youth and an affordable contract. Webb would be ours for two years at least, turned 27 this season, posts an INSANE G/F ratio of 3.8 for his career, respectable K/9, isn't very hittable and can usually be counted on for 200+. He's a local boy and would likely sign to a LTC. There are few guys I would trade Bailey for, none of which I've heard for trade except Webb.Originally Posted by homerun21
But again, I haven't heard anything about the Reds involvement in this so I think this is a non-issue without question. And I think Wayne K is just fine with keeping Bailey and I think the Diamondbacks would ONLY trade him if they get back way way more than just Bailey. Because unless they did that, it wouldn't make any sense for them given their position.
.: My Last.fm
Except even if Bailey's as good as advertised(not certain), he likely will be no better than Webb, who is a proven commodity and is still young.
The Simpson family gathers around, as Homer places Bart's passed test on the fridge.)
Homer: We're proud of you, boy.
Bart: Thanks, Dad. But part of this D-minus belongs to God.
Watch the Reds trade Bailey and Encarnacion and hire Dusty Baker. Hey, it worked for the Cubs.
No thanks, Narron abuses our pitchers enough as it is.Originally Posted by Saber
.: My Last.fm
I really doubt Ward will become anything great. We have had so many of his so called types over recent years like Basham and Gardener.
I don't hate this trade, at the same time I'm not jumping up and down with joy. I just don't know why some people have to be so negative. It's like Carl has come back.
Why be so negative?
It's funny you mentioned Lindner in that same sentence. The reason we have to be negative is because the organization continues to make lame deals that don't really do much to improve the team.
We're still waiting for that "burning to desire to win" that Castellini said he has.
The Simpson family gathers around, as Homer places Bart's passed test on the fridge.)
Homer: We're proud of you, boy.
Bart: Thanks, Dad. But part of this D-minus belongs to God.
At least he's trying to some degree.
Lindner never cared about winning.