Originally Posted by cbs.sportsline.com
He's becoming a bit inconsistent, but he is still solid. I would like to see him back, although 9 million is a bit steep. He should make that mark though so we may be stuck with that.
Originally Posted by cbs.sportsline.com
He's becoming a bit inconsistent, but he is still solid. I would like to see him back, although 9 million is a bit steep. He should make that mark though so we may be stuck with that.
I aim to try
"Nothing is what rocks dream of."-Aristotle
he'll get the option as that will kick in regardless unless he gets hurt. whether he chooses to return or not, is another story. i think he still has some stuff left in the tank, as evidenced by his last two performances. He'd still be a valuable weapon next year, even as a #4/5 starter.
The art of being an engineer: packing 10 lbs of crap into a 5 lb box.
"If Hooter's fell, for all practical purposes the world was lost." Von Neumann's War
http://www.myspace.com/rockinray1
yea, he'll still have value, but $9 million seems a bit much for a 4th or 5th starter...but the Cubs do have the 8th highest payroll at $87,210,933, so they may not care
I agree $9 million is way too much for Maddux. But with the Cubs payroll, if they can't do better with that 9 mill, then keep him for sure. But somehow I think they could get a better arm for that price.
he's already been in the budget. remember, the cubs had a 104 million dollar payroll this year. officially, its only 87, but that 87 doesnt include the 17 million dollar lump sum they owed sammy for this year. So if they go back up to 100 million for next year, he wont really be a detriment to the team's payroll.
The art of being an engineer: packing 10 lbs of crap into a 5 lb box.
"If Hooter's fell, for all practical purposes the world was lost." Von Neumann's War
http://www.myspace.com/rockinray1